Downloads
White Paper: Noncompliance To FDA Quality Standards: What's The Risk To Executives?
By Michael S. Heyl, Attorney at Law
Just imagine. Your life science company--hypothetically speaking--is now a successful and growthoriented organization. Thus far, you've kept governmental regulations in check, quality is steadily improving, and you've even managed to lower the cost of production. Then one day when operations seem calm, smooth--even simple--the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) shows up for an unannounced inspection of your facility. Your confidence is still high. Everything seems to be in order.
The Bombshell
After what seems to be a successful inspection, the FDA investigator leaves you with a Form FDA
483 list of inspectional observations at the close out meeting. Not only does the 483 include eight
inspectional observations identifying deficiencies in the company's quality system, but one deficiency
reigns supreme: "Management has not ensured that the quality system requirements are effectively
established and maintained." How much could this cost upper management? How much could it cost
your company? It could be hundreds-of-thousands. It could be millions.
Heavy Responsibilities in High Places
Life science companies rely on the expertise of dozens or even hundreds of employees. These
employees provide the expertise that is essential to the health of an organization. However, the
responsibility for their actions and for the systems they employ lies directly on the shoulders of upper
management who can suffer both personally and financially the repercussions of decisions, actions or
processes that do not conform to a company's quality policy or to regulatory requirements enforced by
the FDA.
The content you requested is only available to registered users of Pharmaceutical Online. By registering now, you'll get access to this piece of content and thousands of additional articles and product reviews across our entire network of sites.

